Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

If You Were a Program Funder…

Updated on: Mar 27th, 2012
Data Visualization
Collage of a bar chart, people, arrow, computer and calendar.

If you worked for the federal, state, or local government, or if you worked for a foundation, or if you were a private donor… Would you rather fund a program that:

  • Had zero prior evaluation data vs. had prior evaluation data that showed little or no positive results?
  • Would use some of the money to hire internal evaluators vs. would spend all the money on directly costs (like staff salaries, or materials, or gift cards for the program participants)?
  • Had a huge commitment to track data internally but was found to have negative evaluation results vs. had not committed any data internally (so the program may be doing well or may be doing poorly, but nobody knows for sure)?
  • Had been evaluated more rigorously but had little or no positive effect on participants vs. a program that had been evaluated less rigorously that was shown to have a positive effect on participants?
  • Would use the money to hire an external evalautor vs. would use the money to hire an internal evaluator?
  • Wanted to collect information for internal uses (like helping program staff collect baseline academic data that helped them place students into tutoring groups based on their academic level) vs. fund an evaluation for external audiences (like making sure that the program you’re funding was accountable to the standards you set forth)?

I understand that past evalaution results are just one of many factors in the decision to fund a program, but I wonder… How do you think that donors in the government or in foundations would answer these questions?

More about Ann K. Emery
Ann K. Emery is a sought-after speaker who is determined to get your data out of spreadsheets and into stakeholders’ hands. Each year, she leads more than 100 workshops, webinars, and keynotes for thousands of people around the globe. Her design consultancy also overhauls graphs, publications, and slideshows with the goal of making technical information easier to understand for non-technical audiences.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You Might Like

Our complimentary mini course for beginners to dataviz. Takes 45 minutes to complete.


Change Takes Time: How to Practice Patience in Report Redesign Processes

Guest author Abby Henderson started to have conversations with her colleagues about how they could change their reporting. She started by suggesting they add more data visualizations and fewer tables. When she met resistance to this idea, she started to produce two versions of the reports. One version included the tables they were accustomed to, and the second version included more elements of data visualization. Through providing both options, Abby was able to slowly garner traction and buy-in on including data visualizations.

More »

Inside our flagship dataviz course, you’ll learn software-agnostic skills that can (and should!) be applied to every software program. You’ll customize graphs for your audience, go beyond bar charts, and use accessible colors and text.



Not another fluffy newsletter. Get actionable tips, videos and strategies from Ann in your inbox.